| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Stuart Herbert wrote: |
| 5 |
| I agree that some cleaning is needed (and some of my packages are |
| 6 |
| desperate for it!), but I'm totally opposed to this idea. I think the |
| 7 |
| idea of shutting up shop for three months (presumably with a "closed |
| 8 |
| for refurbishment" sign on the door) would let down our users who rely |
| 9 |
| on us for regular package updates, and would be a massive PR disaster. |
| 10 |
| Cleaning is something that has to happen all the time; it needs to be |
| 11 |
| a natural and sustainable part of what we do every day. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I inferred "new packages" to be actual new packages and not updates to |
| 14 |
existing packages already in the tree. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That's considerably less dramatic than what you're saying. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks, |
| 19 |
Donnie |
| 20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
iD8DBQFDwH9yXVaO67S1rtsRAlhzAKDtYLmNH1988nv+t6AXs8EBXCGL2ACgunH5 |
| 24 |
YuqWmn3xVX2Z4548LhL7arA= |
| 25 |
=INQ6 |
| 26 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives