| 1 |
William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:13:06PM -0500, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> |
| 5 |
>>> This is not quite correct. The initramfs is required because of [1]. |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> William |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>> Where is [1]? |
| 11 |
> [1] http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> We have a way around this in some limited circumstances with |
| 14 |
> busybox[sep-usr], but that definitely does not support anything fancy |
| 15 |
> like rade, lvm, etc. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> William |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ah, read that link a while back. Nothing new there I don't guess. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Dale |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
:-) :-) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! |
Archives