1 |
On Monday 26 July 2004 05:53 am, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> I've kept my now arch keywordless binutils, pending a bit more info. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> One more line describing /why/ the testing failed, causing the keyword |
5 |
> revocation, would likely have been /incredibly/ helpful. |
6 |
|
7 |
it spews a frightening number of (non-fatal) warnings while compiling a kernel |
8 |
and i have one person who is getting a BFD internal error. I removed the |
9 |
~amd64 keyword more because i dont trust it and to be cautious than anything |
10 |
else. 2.15.90.0.1.1-r3 should be pretty solid on amd64, this is the version |
11 |
in stable (and now the latest version available to ~amd64 users). if you have |
12 |
any problems with it, please feel free to beat me with a stick till it's |
13 |
fixed. ;) |
14 |
|
15 |
i do apologise for the less than helpful changelog entry. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
|
19 |
Travis Tilley <lv@g.o> |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |