| 1 |
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:34:38 -0800 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> I'd like |
| 4 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6b3e00049a1bf35fbf7a5e66d1449553.xml |
| 5 |
> to be discussed, specifically zacs form of forced mtime updating of |
| 6 |
> /var/db/pkg on vdb modifications |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I've still not had an answer to: |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
"Provide proof that all existing and future caches that would rely upon |
| 11 |
this validation mechanism are functions purely and exclusively |
| 12 |
dependent upon the VDB content, and I shall be happy to make the |
| 13 |
change." |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Without that proof, all introducing that change would do is provide |
| 16 |
another unreliable mechanism, so it's of no use at all. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives