| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Jim Bowlin wrote: |
| 5 |
| I've been watching this thread |
| 6 |
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=303720 |
| 7 |
| which echos what I've seen myself: -U seems to be flakey. I'd like to try |
| 8 |
| to fix this but I don't want to reinvent the wheel. Is someone already |
| 9 |
| working on this problem? Is version 2.0 about to come out? |
| 10 |
In absence of a dev, I can say that the source for the 2_1 branch ( nThe |
| 11 |
latest one ) claimed NOT to support the no-downgrade. Unless someone |
| 12 |
wrote somethingin the last week, I think this is where it stands. |
| 13 |
However, you can always priv-mess carpaski. He the man. ;) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
========================================= |
| 19 |
daniel.armyr@××××.se f00-dar@×××××.se |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
C118 KEVII Hall |
| 22 |
1A Kent Ridge Rd S.119224 |
| 23 |
Singapore PGP@×××××××.edu |
| 24 |
========================================= |
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 27 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iD8DBQE+sGhRhxtTUWLs2lERAj3dAJ9CcLHKSCBUyjO943BBHN1WGmrjoQCfVnZ2 |
| 30 |
H8UCTsnRzulTX51kWiNlQvE= |
| 31 |
=6pZa |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives