| 1 |
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 12:58, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 28 September 2005 00:35, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
> > IUSE_VIDEO_CARDS="radeon sis mga" |
| 4 |
> > IUSE_INPUT_DEVICES="synaptics wacom" |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> So, my patch (even though it works) puts these flags into an IUSE_EXPAND |
| 7 |
> variable and would require an upgrade on the CVS server to get correct |
| 8 |
> cache generation for users. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> What are the exact reasons for not wanting to put the expanded flags |
| 11 |
> directly into IUSE? If it's just a matter of the horrid display existing |
| 12 |
> tools would give, the functionality can go in and IUSE updated after the |
| 13 |
> functional versions are stabled. Are there any reasons beyond that? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
And a patch to do it the IUSE way. Note the size difference below even though |
| 16 |
both patches end up with the same output for the end user. Also note that |
| 17 |
this way doesn't require an upgrade on the CVS server. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
$ wc -c verbose-IUSE* |
| 20 |
3698 verbose-IUSE-support.patch |
| 21 |
6110 verbose-IUSE_EXPAND-support.patch |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives