Archives
Archives
| From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>, udev-bugs@g.o, systemd <systemd@g.o>, base-system <base-system@g.o>, agk@××××××.com, Federico Tomassetti <f.tomassetti@×××××.com> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2 | ||
| Date: | Thu, 01 Aug 2013 17:46:34 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1375379183.1013.4.camel@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2 by Luca Barbato |
||
| 1 | El jue, 01-08-2013 a las 18:11 +0200, Luca Barbato escribió: |
| 2 | > On 01/08/13 17:36, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 | > > So esystemd and ekmod now? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > You know my stance on systemd, for me it is a jumble of bad and |
| 6 | > interesting ideas not so soundly implemented, I do not have much time or |
| 7 | > will to play with that thing. |
| 8 | > |
| 9 | > kmod on the other hand had a pressing issue and getting it fixed-ish |
| 10 | > took about an evening while having Federico see around it. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > lu |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | |
| 15 | But, what are the advantages of putting a lot of effort in keeping |
| 16 | static libs for udev? Looks like nothing really need them, and even |
| 17 | Debian (that doesn't use systemd by default) drops them |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2 | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |