| 1 |
Michael Palimaka schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On 23/09/2013 22:03, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> Well it should, because ~arch was supposed to mean "candidate for |
| 5 |
>> becoming arch". |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> I tend to agree. I remember someone one saying something like "if it |
| 9 |
> will never be a candidate for stable it doesn't belong in the tree." |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
There was an extensive discussion about this topic (whether packages |
| 13 |
unfit or not intended for stable should enter ~arch, or even the tree) |
| 14 |
some time ago, which I don't plan to restart. Suffice to say, consensus |
| 15 |
was not reached. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Best regards, |
| 19 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives