1 |
El lun, 17-09-2012 a las 14:47 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
2 |
> On 17/09/12 12:03, Peter Stuge wrote: |
3 |
> > Pacho Ramos wrote: |
4 |
> >>>>>> # Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> (16 Sep 2012) |
5 |
> >>>>>> # Upstream keeps inactive for ages and, then, it has broke again |
6 |
> >>>>>> # now with gnutls-3 (#421385). Removal in a month. |
7 |
> >>>>>> net-im/jabberd |
8 |
> >>>>> |
9 |
> >>>>> What about the 1.4 version? It depends on openssl, so maybe it |
10 |
> >>>>> doesn't have the gnutls issue. |
11 |
> >> |
12 |
> >> I really doubt even oldest 1.4 version will have less unresolved bugs |
13 |
> >> than current (already unmaintained and buggy) 1.6.x versions |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > Should you check that, before removing it? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> That would be a job for the maintainer of the package, not member of the |
18 |
> treecleaners... |
19 |
> |
20 |
> -Samuli |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
You also would need to provide a fix for existing bug, not keep it as-is |
25 |
forever |