| 1 |
On Sat, 25 May 2013 14:48:30 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I'm wondering if we should create a more global function for calling |
| 5 |
> ninja in a consistent way. Maybe we should introduce a NINJAOPTS |
| 6 |
> variable for users to set in make.conf. Should we create a new eclass |
| 7 |
> for this, or just stick it in eutils? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Is NINJAOPTS a variable recognized by ninja or something that would be Gentoo |
| 10 |
specific? It'd be nice if you could parse out what you need from MAKEOPTS |
| 11 |
instead, but I have no strong feelings. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If there's only two users in the tree right now I don't think an eclass is |
| 14 |
warranted. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ryan Hill psn: dirtyepic_sk |
| 19 |
gcc-porting/toolchain/wxwidgets @ gentoo.org |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
47C3 6D62 4864 0E49 8E9E 7F92 ED38 BD49 957A 8463 |
Archives