| 1 |
On 03/03/07, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Because it is difficult to determine 'people who know what they are |
| 3 |
> > talking about'. I would say Brian Harring is one of those, but I |
| 4 |
> > have a feeling you would disagree with me. All I really know is that |
| 5 |
> > I am not one of those people. I think this is once again part of |
| 6 |
> > Daniel's point. Interested parties should be able to collaborate |
| 7 |
> > (even if it's in a private repo to keep prying eyes away). But you |
| 8 |
> > are basically turning away a portion of interested parties. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Interested parties are more than welcome to ask for access. Not a |
| 11 |
> single person who is complaining about lack of transparency has done so. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
On 22/02/07, Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Doing it formally, I hereby request access to PMS specifically with |
| 16 |
> the intention of going over it to spot where it differs from long |
| 17 |
> standing portage behaviour. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
-Charlie |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives