1 |
> If people want an interactive mode, we can add one (I have no |
2 |
> reason to oppose |
3 |
> it, as long as a non-interactive build is the default). It |
4 |
> could be really |
5 |
> handy. But we need the new USE system first. In the |
6 |
> meantime, I have no |
7 |
> problem with you discussing how you'd like an interactive |
8 |
> build mode to work, |
9 |
> since we'll most likely add one eventually. |
10 |
|
11 |
I agree that non-interactive should always be the default. My feeling is |
12 |
that a user who has specific needs should be able to fine tune things by |
13 |
going into interactive mode. But by the same token, I think that you should |
14 |
be able to accomplish everything on the command line that you can |
15 |
interactively. |
16 |
|
17 |
I'd like to help with this, as I have some interest in it. |
18 |
|
19 |
Sean |
20 |
|
21 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
22 |
Sean Mitchell Software Engineer |
23 |
smitchell@×××××××××××××××××××.com Phoenix Interactive Design Inc |
24 |
tel. 519-679-2913 x237 4th Floor, 137 Dundas St |
25 |
fax. 519 679 6773 London, ON, Canada N6A 1E9 |
26 |
ICQ# 104246806 |
27 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------ |