| 1 |
On Mar 27, 2011 11:01 AM, "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> And how exactly you want to track the level of failure for the package? |
| 3 |
> Since nobody is watching them already we usually don't know how much |
| 4 |
> they fail until somebody tries to emerge them from dev team or notify QA |
| 5 |
> by adding as CC to bug... |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
If a tree falls in the forest...does anybody care? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Broken packages that nobody notices don't cost us much. A tinderbox sweep |
| 10 |
will id and tag them for cleaning eventually. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
All I'm saying is that the problem is broken packages, so address those, m-n |
| 13 |
or otherwise. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
By all means be proactive about finding maintainers, but let's not go |
| 16 |
purging working packages. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
As far as how broken is too broken - if it causes the distro headaches, |
| 19 |
address it. That could be blockers, or tons of bug reports, or whatever... |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Rich |
Archives