| 1 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> This is only one of the issue. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Not all cases need to be solved: If a developer decides |
| 6 |
that no revbump is not necessary, he should not have a |
| 7 |
too problematic change... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> And what if the match for :=3D is |
| 10 |
> incompatible with new dependency atom? Like when you replace |
| 11 |
> 'dev-foo/bar:=3D' with '>=3Ddev-foo/bar-2:=3D' but bar-1 is installed. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
This is simple: The dependency is not satisfied. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> What if a new :=3D dependency is added? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If it is *added* in an || ( ... ), it can safely be ignored. |
| 18 |
Adding such a dependency unconditionally should probably |
| 19 |
require a revbump. |
Archives