| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 2009.06.08 16:48, Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 5 |
[snip] |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Very small point. There is a difference between "EAPI in the file |
| 8 |
> name |
| 9 |
> extension" and just "EAPI in the file name". I think the intent here |
| 10 |
> is |
| 11 |
> the latter, but it speaks of them interchangeably it seems. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Regards, |
| 14 |
> Ferris |
| 15 |
> -- |
| 16 |
> Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
| 17 |
> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Userrel, Trustees) |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
Ferris, |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Its not a small point, it makes quite a difference. In most places the |
| 22 |
glep should talk about "EAPI in the file name", not "EAPI in the file |
| 23 |
name extension". |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
dev-zero got to me first on that and I need to update the glep. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
- -- |
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Roy Bamford |
| 31 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
| 32 |
gentoo-ops |
| 33 |
forum-mods |
| 34 |
treecleaners |
| 35 |
trustees |
| 36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 37 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkotc4EACgkQTE4/y7nJvatWFwCeIyq5Ks/WzTUImTJXaoRQG5Pc |
| 40 |
x5QAnjOm+jfgQ5/3vBqJyPsRDOtc6YCF |
| 41 |
=yoel |
| 42 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives