| 1 |
On Sat, 05 Aug 2006 09:29:48 -0400 |
| 2 |
"Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 13:14:17 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > Sascha Geschwandtner <s.geschwandtner@×××.de> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> So right now, I'd like to see "collision-protect sandbox strict" |
| 9 |
> >> included in the default FEATUREs. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > sandbox and strict are already default for a long time. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Not 100% true. Sandbox has been broken on mips for the entirety of |
| 14 |
> its existence, so we have to disable it in the top level mips |
| 15 |
> profile. It is something that we would like to see fixed for real. |
| 16 |
> Kumba snagged some patch from debian for glibc that quasi-fixes it, |
| 17 |
> where by that I mean it goes from being 100% unusable to about 80% |
| 18 |
> unusable. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I know, but mips is a special case here (together with the non-linux |
| 21 |
platforms). |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> -Steve |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> P.S. Note that we have offered various portage devs hardware and/or |
| 27 |
> an account on Iluxa's ginormous Origin 2000 machine in the past with |
| 28 |
> the intention of getting this fixed, and nobody has taken us up on |
| 29 |
> that... |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Probably because portage devs don't know much about sandbox internals |
| 32 |
either, really I think the only person that could help you there right |
| 33 |
now is Az (or maybe the SoC guy working on a BSD port of sandbox). |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Marius |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 41 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives