| 1 |
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:53:37 +0200 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Don't you see this way of handling things, with such and obscure way |
| 4 |
> of getting things accepted for every EAPI is really hurting us? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
What is hurting is people demanding features without specifying what |
| 7 |
the problem is, how it will be solved or what the impact on users or |
| 8 |
developers will be, and then taking up everyone's time with complaints |
| 9 |
when they don't get magical flying unicorns instantly. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If you want something, you either have to do the work yourself, or find |
| 12 |
someone to do it. And here's the thing: you're assuming that "the work" |
| 13 |
is trivial, which for some of the things you're discussing it really |
| 14 |
isn't. The PMS wording is the trivial bit that comes at the end once |
| 15 |
the problem and solution have been worked out. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives