| 1 |
El mié, 26-10-2011 a las 22:58 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 26-10-2011 20:05:05 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Why don't we try to reach a consensus? Maybe we should be allowed to |
| 4 |
> > simply run echangelog (or whatever is used) to generate a message like: |
| 5 |
> > 26 Oct 2011; Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> -pangomm-2.26.3.ebuild |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > And simply that |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > Pros: |
| 10 |
> > - People refusing to add a message saying "Drop old" (or similar) could |
| 11 |
> > be happy with this, as no redundant information is required to be |
| 12 |
> > written in ChangeLog. |
| 13 |
> > - Users will still see that a package was removed, as it's indicated |
| 14 |
> > with "-" previous removed file. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > What do you think? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> You can see it has been removed, but you typically want to know why. |
| 19 |
> That's the idea of the ChangeLog file. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Compare: |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> old |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> remove for security bug ... |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> [this is a placeholder, please ignore] |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> ^ |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Version bump |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Remove superseeded versions |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Drop due to dep on <libpng-1.5 |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
But most of times we simply remove old versions because they are old |
| 40 |
and, in that case, there is no need to add "Drop old" (as I am currently |
| 41 |
doing) |
Archives