Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 06/10] glep-0072: Update initial values
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 07:01:26
Message-Id: 20200410065847.96199-7-mgorny@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/10] GLEP 72 (arches.desc) revival by "Michał Górny"
1 I'm not aware of any profiles that should be set to 'degraded', so let's
2 focus on the immediate problem of stable/testing. It will also probably
3 make sense to wait before we start using the third state.
4
5 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
6 ---
7 glep-0072.rst | 7 +++----
8 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
9
10 diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst
11 index b60d269..d6e96d5 100644
12 --- a/glep-0072.rst
13 +++ b/glep-0072.rst
14 @@ -107,10 +107,9 @@ An example arches.desc file might look as follows::
15 Initial value in the gentoo repository
16 --------------------------------------
17
18 -On introduction, the setting will be ``stable`` for all stable architectures,
19 -``degraded`` for all architectures where "inofficial" stable keywords are
20 -maintained and are present in the repository by the arch teams (sh, s390,
21 -...), and ``testing`` everywhere else.
22 +On introduction, the setting will be ``stable`` for all architectures using
23 +stable keywords, and ``testing`` for those that do not (``alpha``, ``mips``,
24 +``riscv``, Prefix profiles at the moment).
25
26 Meaning of the values for repoman
27 ---------------------------------
28 --
29 2.26.0