Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:25:45
Message-Id: 5568594a91e72e6cafce5b1d1c29ce80@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed by Luca Barbato
1 On Apr 7, 2005, at 7:33 am, Luca Barbato wrote:
2 > Brian Harring wrote:
3 >> Problem with the preference you have above is you're considering
4 >> portage as the primary pkg manager/authority for that system, which it
5 >> isn't on osx.
6 > If a tool is broken you change it, the apple toolchain and probably
7 > userspace could enjoy some improvements.
8
9 Do you actually use OS X?
10
11 This is not a case of sed being broken on BSD / OS X - on a Mac
12 everything works fine out of the box, and users can use standard tools,
13 many of which are provided, just like on any other *NIX. This is a case
14 where the use of Gentoo would make compiling packages easier & more
15 convenient for OS X users, and Gentoo prefers a non-standard tool; the
16 Apple install is not "broken" and many people would not consider
17 messing with it to be beneficial.
18
19 Stroller.
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] perl, sed and non-gsed Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o>