| 1 |
On Monday 26 July 2004 07:04 pm, Danny van Dyk wrote: |
| 2 |
> | The fifth field "distribution", is not part of GLEP 22, however it was |
| 3 |
> | discussed that both macos as well as bsd would need the fifth field to |
| 4 |
> | differentiate between different operating environments. For example, |
| 5 |
> | adium is a net-im application which works on macos, but would not work |
| 6 |
> | on pure darwin. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Well, i would put this into the USERLAND part: |
| 9 |
> ppc[64]-mach-macos-libsystem |
| 10 |
> ppc[64]-mach-darwin-libsystem |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Mac OSX userland _is_ different from bsd userland, so just put it there. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
agreed |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> | under this same category. For example, x86-linux-gnu-glibc-suse. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> That keyword is imho nonsense: a keyword shall distinguish between |
| 19 |
> premisses. I can't imagine a situation, in which an application would |
| 20 |
> refuse to work under SUSE linux because it is SUSE, apart from missing |
| 21 |
> dependencies. But the keyword should not be about package dependencies ! |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
++agreed |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> I don't think we need an amendment, GLEP 22 is sufficient for this. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58655 |
| 28 |
-mike |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives