| 1 |
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015 02:34:22 +1300 |
| 2 |
Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> On 7 November 2015 at 02:16, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > These days, if I'm careful to revbump when necessary AND limit my |
| 5 |
> > commits to one logical change, can I wind up going from (say) -r1 |
| 6 |
> > all the way to -r4 before pushing my changes. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Personally I don't think that's necessary. The "-r bump on dep change" |
| 9 |
> argument is a defence against installer limitations and the |
| 10 |
> replication of changes to users. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
No it isn't. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives