| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Dne 8.8.2010 12:05, Brian Harring napsal(a): |
| 5 |
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:10:01AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
>> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 01:55:26 -0700 |
| 7 |
>> Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> Put it to a vote then, rather than flaming every few months that g55 |
| 9 |
>>> solves all EAPI issues/world hunger. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> Seriously, if the people wanting g55 can't be bothered to try and |
| 12 |
>>> make their proposal accepted/official, than all they're doing is |
| 13 |
>>> trolling/flaming/bitching, and wasting other peoples time. |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> GLEP 55 *was* put up for a vote, along with GLEP 54, on 20090514. GLEP |
| 16 |
>> 54 was accepted subject to GLEP 55 being approved. The vote on GLEP 55 |
| 17 |
>> was a tie. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> A tie, with a decision to revisit next meeting- the next meeting it |
| 20 |
> was decided that yes, g55 is addressing what can be considered a real |
| 21 |
> issue. And in the 14 months since then, no one has requested it be |
| 22 |
> voted on, or revisited. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> That's the thing; the quibbling in details is lovely, as is the |
| 25 |
> repeated rehashing of the same technical matter, over and over, but |
| 26 |
> the path required to get it approved is established. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Push it to the council and ask for a vote. They drop it from their |
| 29 |
> plate, push it back to the council again. That route at least has the |
| 30 |
> chance of being productive. Hell, run for council if you're tired of |
| 31 |
> them dropping things. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> Instead we've got continual sniping over the damned glep instead of |
| 34 |
> taking the proactive steps. Either way, unless I get beat down by |
| 35 |
> the other council members this will be on the next council agenda. |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> If it can be squeezed into the coming monday meeting, I'd prefer it, |
| 38 |
> but it's short notice I realize. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> ~harring |
| 41 |
We can nominate it for next meeting, but not this one, we cant asure |
| 42 |
that all members are aware of all details for glep-55 so they need some |
| 43 |
time to investigate them. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Tom |
| 46 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 47 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) |
| 48 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkxeg6oACgkQHB6c3gNBRYd2NgCeJrmHrapWDHqpyXlnn8c+HLhJ |
| 51 |
xUoAoLDRfSRc+ejByoMQ/1v+0O1VyyEb |
| 52 |
=KGMd |
| 53 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives