Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:10:32
Message-Id: 20080630141009.22dcdb61@halo.dirtyepic.sk.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common" by "Petteri Räty"
1 On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:42:49 +0300
2 Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Mike Frysinger kirjoitti:
5 > > On Saturday 28 June 2008, Petteri Räty wrote:
6 > >> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis kirjoitti:
7 > >>> I would like to suggest that default LDFLAGS in Gentoo contain the
8 > >>> following flags: "-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common".
9 > >>>
10 > >>> -O1 enables some basic optimizations.
11 > >> At least adding -O1 should not be problematic. I think vapier was
12 > >> already suggesting this quite a while ago.
13 > >
14 > > imo -Wl,-O1 should go into base
15 > > -mike
16 >
17 > So seems like we should just do it (tm).
18
19 Why not default/linux?
20
21
22 --
23 gcc-porting, by design, by neglect
24 treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect
25 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies