| 1 |
El sáb, 22-06-2013 a las 00:06 +0000, Robin H. Johnson escribió: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
> I'm not going into review systems here at all, I'm simply trying to have |
| 4 |
> a policy of what changes are welcomed/blocked WITHOUT interaction from |
| 5 |
> the listed maintainer(s) of a given package/herd. |
| 6 |
[...] |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
In my case I would like to be always notified a change has been |
| 9 |
committed (even forwarding gentoo-commits message to me), that will help |
| 10 |
me to keep track of the committed changes, and learn more if they |
| 11 |
corrected a bug caused by me ;) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Regarding what other can commit or not... I think a general good policy |
| 14 |
would be to: |
| 15 |
1. If package is not hardly broken -> report a bug to maintainer with a |
| 16 |
1 week timeout. If he/she doesn't reply, go ahead. |
| 17 |
2. If package is nonfunctional -> go ahead and fix it as soon as |
| 18 |
possible! |
Archives