Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ?
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:39:58
Message-Id: 4EADD18F.9050300@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portability.eclass: dead egethome, egetshell, is-login-disabled funcs ? by "Petteri Räty"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 10/30/2011 10:33 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
5 > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote:
6 >> i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell,
7 >> is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason
8 >> for keeping these before i punt them ? -mike
9 >>
10 >
11 > Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break
12 > backwards compatibility as long as an eclass exists?
13 >
14 > Regards, Petteri
15 >
16
17 We have no have direct control on overlays. It is up to maintainers to
18 ensure that their packages work with portage eclasses or they can have
19 their own eclasses locally.
20
21 - --
22 Regards,
23 Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
24 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
25 Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
26
27 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOrdGOAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCvOsP/RDCgBYuZhgy8e3/MBqD7nyx
28 wnWyGeLBV7q8n8kVnRCMIKlgiKxKnphPUZhkcddxstzoGv3nAzValxXVkfkyhl4G
29 Z2Kr8FXZZWOSKVDWTaEcZcOvAnBKZISs8kAhH/3wBzw4SrbocxHw+8i1Xs7ZW0nk
30 3gZDf+3sRKuKzg1rMf8uO0FE82DB5E5LZSuelEXovF7oqH/Re6jurdsoAdV4umD5
31 GZM3sC2bLzArwRdXQNgcx5t596eUDzg8AHEsu+tUxblbSR/xeBV7uMKluZVvD+Mf
32 93LTWZSuHg0bRKY+Kei4F5+thEq39MA4J2/07Rz/s3AgVYHNX+O7K//AuJvNc3Gl
33 C8hLkl2XsUZPlEuaCveuJahb/U84q+Bi2+6albP/hRzZ+Gsf8OrY8vksBRgy//Ew
34 YVPz9lZn6kiJVGJkVAvdAqbKpJrMBADBFJM8twzjEXD/b0oAK/oiCx2c136dAta7
35 zWB4izhuT2waShV0Fa6LIQG41tYMMPw/2l/4QMH92mFUt88aJE20wP3c92xIWZ7j
36 N6n2XZrU9R5zuhTMvbc6EZTS80dG0Cu07VJdJs7TFSIViqJZ4bKe547VcnhjbSBM
37 r8DZTi9s4nbR8N7igN8q3sr/o3fUsuHh0hMFgUe/HKauHBliiTTML2wwXtZjkXWz
38 kNFxOQgozKg3BMyXNggc
39 =IwIg
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies