| 1 |
On 09/11/2010 11:20 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Saturday 11 of September 2010 22:18:32 Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 09/11/2010 11:14 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:10:51 +0300 |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>>> + |
| 8 |
>>>>> +*hachoir-parser-1.3.4 (10 Sep 2010) |
| 9 |
>>>>> + |
| 10 |
>>>>> + 10 Sep 2010; Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
| 11 |
>>>>> <arfrever@g.o> + -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild, |
| 12 |
>>>>> +hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild: + Version bump. |
| 13 |
>>>> |
| 14 |
>>>> Deleting an older version is relevant so it should also be mentioned in |
| 15 |
>>>> the ChangeLog message. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>>> It says -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild. What exactly do you think would be |
| 18 |
>>> gained by adding "Remove old" in this case? |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> Following your logic we should not write "Version bump" either (as |
| 21 |
>> that's what happens by default when you add a new ebuild). |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Considering the fact, that ChangeLogs are files that contribute to rsync/cvs |
| 24 |
> fetch the most, it's not that bad idea... |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
ChangeLog not changing at all would probably save traffic there but even |
| 28 |
without no custom message there's still the echangelog generated part |
| 29 |
about changed files. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Petteri |
Archives