Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, zmedico@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-apps/portage: ChangeLog portage-2.1.3.11.ebuild portage-2.1.3.10.ebuild
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 04:52:20
Message-Id: 20070929044050.GF24088@supernova
1 On 23:10 Fri 28 Sep , Zac Medico (zmedico) wrote:
2 > zmedico 07/09/28 23:10:10
3 >
4 > Modified: ChangeLog
5 > Added: portage-2.1.3.11.ebuild
6 > Removed: portage-2.1.3.10.ebuild
7 > Log:
8 > 2.1.3.11 bump. This fixes bugs #192706, #193548, and #194081. Most
9 > important is bug #194081 which is a regression in 2.1.3.10 that causes
10 > 'Device or resource busy' errors during unmerge. Bug #194041 tracks
11 > all bugs fixed since 2.1.3.9.
12 > (Portage version: 2.1.3.11)
13 >
14 > Revision Changes Path
15 > 1.446 sys-apps/portage/ChangeLog
16 >
17 > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/portage/ChangeLog?rev=1.446&view=markup
18 > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/portage/ChangeLog?rev=1.446&content-type=text/plain
19 > diff : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/portage/ChangeLog?r1=1.445&r2=1.446
20
21 > @@ -43,24 +51,6 @@
22 > 08 Sep 2007; Joseph Jezak <josejx@g.o> portage-2.1.2.12.ebuild:
23 > Marked ppc64 stable for bug #189289.
24 >
25 > -*portage-2.1.3.8 (07 Sep 2007)
26 > -
27 > - 07 Sep 2007; Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> +portage-2.1.3.8.ebuild:
28 > - 2.1.3.8 bump. This fixes bugs #110443, #190144, #190214, #190268,
29 > - #190406. Bug #181949 tracks all bugs fixed since 2.1.2.x. This release
30 > - also includes a merge order optimization that causes installed
31 > - dependencies to be rebuilt earlier which helps avoid build failures
32 > - during `emerge -e system` after the CHOST has been changed (like when
33 > - building a stage3 from a stage2).
34 > -
35
36 You deleted a huge chunk of the ChangeLog. Might want to check for bugs
37 in whatever tool you're using.
38
39 Thanks,
40 Donnie
41 --
42 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies