| 1 |
> Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 2 |
> With all due respect, for some reason we don't have Proctors |
| 3 |
> anymore to enforce the CoC. Thus, things we would expect the |
| 4 |
> proctors to catch and handle under CoC get sent to devrel |
| 5 |
> instead. All I am doing is wondering out loud (now that CoC |
| 6 |
> is coming alive again) if we should start processing these |
| 7 |
> under CoC rules. I'm asking Council because CoC belongs to |
| 8 |
> Council, but I do not expect a ruling, just perhaps an |
| 9 |
> interesting discussion. See, these things can't be caught |
| 10 |
> before they get to devrel because you ensured there would be |
| 11 |
> no one to catch them --- you are the one who wanted to kill |
| 12 |
> off the proctors, after all. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Please lay off the personal attacks here; it's getting beyond ridiculous. |
| 15 |
Wolf31o2 is not the only council member who wanted to 'kill off the |
| 16 |
proctors', see below: |
| 17 |
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20070712-summary.txt |
| 18 |
- Kingtaco wanted a vote to cancel the proctors. robbat2 wanted them to just |
| 19 |
die quietly if no material was forthcoming. Others called for a definate |
| 20 |
stand rather than the "die quietly". All 5 attending council members voted |
| 21 |
in favour of dropping the proctors. |
| 22 |
Seems to me that every council member in attendance decided they wanted to |
| 23 |
'kill off the proctors.' |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Kind regards, |
| 26 |
Christina Fullam |
| 27 |
Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | Gentoo Public Relations |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives