| 1 |
* Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
<big_snip /> |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
IMHO, lzma is far from being mature enough from being suited as |
| 6 |
packaging format for production systems. And actually, I don't |
| 7 |
see the benefit over well-approved tar+(gz|bz2). |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
So my vote is to NOT use it for gentoo source packages. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
cu |
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 15 |
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ |
| 16 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 17 |
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: |
| 18 |
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce |
| 19 |
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: |
| 20 |
http://patches.metux.de/ |
| 21 |
--------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives