| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Saturday 10 July 2004 06:09, Jeff Smelser wrote: |
| 5 |
> right, and here I am, volunteering my time as well. I want to know what I |
| 6 |
> can do.. Bugs are squashed, things should be progressing. |
| 7 |
There are quite a few bugs open. The question is, if they will go in, before a |
| 8 |
KDE 3.2.3(-rX) will be marked stable. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> KDe isn't joe |
| 11 |
> program that you might wait 30 days, kde is tested well before its released |
| 12 |
> from kde, why do we need to rerun the same tests? |
| 13 |
Distro integration and ensuring stability is not the same as a stable - even |
| 14 |
bugfix - upstream release; Waiting 30 days is nothing in this context. If you |
| 15 |
don't want to wait, you are free to use the unstable ebuilds. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Caleb is doing kde-core stuff alone at the moment and had not much time lately |
| 18 |
as he told me. How loud will you cry, when someone who is maintaining your |
| 19 |
favorite bunch of ebuilds is in holidays for four weeks? Reading your emails |
| 20 |
I would think about extending the testing period for another 30 days. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
0.02 ยค invested in fodder. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Carsten |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iD8DBQFA79ZHVwbzmvGLSW8RAiFcAJ0V6CiPrs3zRfOig7PkTCfIEdGbJwCfaAWX |
| 30 |
HkudobnmJ0pWpnh0B0gWGKE= |
| 31 |
=gfgZ |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives