Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 19:23:27
Message-Id: 20030828212339.13ba9c35.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] x11-base/xfree should be virtual/x11 by Jasmin Buchert
1 begin quote
2 On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 21:05:24 +0200
3 Jasmin Buchert <jasmin@×××××××××.ch> wrote:
4
5 > Hi,
6 >
7 > I submitted a bugreport today saying that all x11-base/xfree DEPEND's
8 > should be virtual/x11. But my bugzilla bugreport (Bug #27479) was
9 > reject with the reason: "open up bugs for specific packages" ->
10 > INVALID. What now? Should I make a script that greps for packages with
11 > x11-base/xfree and let it make automatic bugzilla bug requests? ;)
12 >
13
14 Be more specific. virtual/x11 may provide xlib, but may not provide
15 extentions such as XRENDER and other "necessary" things for a modern
16 desktop. This is something that makes a package-by-package decision
17 necessary.
18
19
20 I agree that the bugresolver could have been more verbose, but its
21 generally correct.
22
23 //Spider
24
25
26 --
27 begin .signature
28 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
29 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
30 end