Archives
Archives
| From: | Chris Johnson <cmjohn@×××××××××××.edu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unstable branch proposal - second round | ||
| Date: | Fri, 29 Mar 2002 07:11:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1017407450.18165.243.camel@mule.relentless.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unstable branch proposal - second round by George Shapovalov |
||
| 1 | George and all, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | I'd like to modify/simplify this proposal somewhat. George's proposal is |
| 4 | complementary and more comprehensive, but I try to cut it down to what I |
| 5 | think is the minimally sufficient system. I explain further at this |
| 6 | link: |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Background/motivation: |
| 9 | http://relentless.org:8000/gentoo/ |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Short proposal plus forum: |
| 12 | http://relentless.org:8000/gentoo/forum/message?message_id=6584&forum_id=6581 |
| 13 | Enjoy, and I'm open for comments! |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Chris |
| 16 | |
| 17 | On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 00:52, George Shapovalov wrote: |
| 18 | > Thanks! |
| 19 | > |
| 20 | > you might be willing then to read my detailed description :-), link to which |
| 21 | > I just posted on mailing list: |
| 22 | > http://www.its.caltech.edu/~georges/gentoo/epsp/proposal.html |
| 23 | > |
| 24 | > George |
| 25 | > |
| 26 | > On Wednesday 27 March 2002 19:22, you wrote: |
| 27 | > > It sounds like a good idea! |
| 28 | > > |
| 29 | > _______________________________________________ |
| 30 | > gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 31 | > gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 32 | > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Unstable branch proposal - second round | George Shapovalov <georges@×××××××××××.edu> |