Archives
Archives
| From: | Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver | ||
| Date: | Wed, 23 May 2012 19:41:28 | ||
| Message-Id: | CADqQcK6wMzUA6Mfw3iFq_NDVCuq8EQ8M6=FbVhdS2hfUdYh1yQ@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Arun Raghavan |
||
| 1 | On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Arun Raghavan <ford_prefect@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git |
| 3 | > Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems |
| 4 | > and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's |
| 5 | > good enough for you. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | +1 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | ~Nirbheek Chauhan |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team |