From: | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] x86 vs amd64 :: ppc vs ppc64 (was sys-apps is too big) | ||
Date: | Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:40:14 | ||
Message-Id: | 200502282041.00844.vapier@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-apps is too big by "Olivier Crête" |
1 | On Monday 28 February 2005 08:34 pm, Olivier Crête wrote: |
2 | > On Mon, 2005-28-02 at 17:21 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
3 | > > linux32 -> app-emulation (or maybe sys-devel with mips32/sparc32) |
4 | > |
5 | > Its not emulation... just tells the OS to advertise itself as i686 |
6 | > instead of x86_64. and its not specifically a dev tool |
7 | |
8 | anyone know why ppc64 doesnt do the samething ? if you run a 32bit userspace |
9 | system with 64bit kernel, uname advertizes 'powerpc64' instead of |
10 | 'powerpc' ... |
11 | -mike |
12 | |
13 | -- |
14 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 vs amd64 :: ppc vs ppc64 (was sys-apps is too big) | "Stephen P. Becker" <geoman@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] x86 vs amd64 :: ppc vs ppc64 (was sys-apps is too big) | Kumba <kumba@g.o> |