1 |
well the thing is that you don't want to remove gcc, only portage some |
2 |
unused libs (i doubt their any with default Gentoo install) and probably |
3 |
all those man and doc files. There should be ways to statically link |
4 |
everything, but that might be some work. |
5 |
|
6 |
I got a 200mb install now, that I will hackaway at and try to get it |
7 |
bellow 50mb hopefully I'm thinking of maybe writing something that will |
8 |
use an existing gentoo install and use gentoo's portage and stuff to build |
9 |
an LFS-like (Linux from scratch) image. |
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 jtoyota@×××××××××.net wrote: |
14 |
|
15 |
> ok i'm new to both linux and gentoo. so plz don't flame me. yet, in order to get rid of gcc and portage why not compile or write a self-compile/extract thing-a-ma-jig (pre-build) the packages desired. does this defeat your goal? |
16 |
> |
17 |
> -josh |
18 |
> ============================================================ |
19 |
> From: Vano D <gentoo-dev@××××××××××××××××.com> |
20 |
> Date: 2003/10/28 Tue AM 11:24:12 EST |
21 |
> To: gentoo-dev@g.o |
22 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Embedded |
23 |
> |
24 |
> On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 10:10, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
25 |
> > You could bind mount the portage tree into the root system (of course |
26 |
> > updates will be out of the question). After you're done unmerge portage |
27 |
> > and it works. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> [Still not used to the reply-to. Now off to the list. Paul already has a |
30 |
> copy of my email before anyone else (lucky you ;)] |
31 |
> |
32 |
> This is very interesting. Such a simple idea. Anyhow I have also been |
33 |
> looking at ways to get rid of portage/gcc/dev tools out of Gentoo. But |
34 |
> my goal has been to clean the system of dev tools and thus portage |
35 |
> (since it would be useless without dev tools) so as to create server |
36 |
> installations. (Although I also have had a side interest in getting a |
37 |
> knoppix-like system built solely out of gentoo.) |
38 |
> |
39 |
> I wonder if it would be possible to somehow remotely "mount" the rest of |
40 |
> the stuff such as gcc/python etc.. as with portage. So this way the |
41 |
> system would be completely clean and when it needs to be updated a |
42 |
> script would mount/link the tools from a remote system and after its |
43 |
> done upgrading it would unlink and we are left with a lean clean system. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Any thoughts on this? |
46 |
> |
47 |
> PD. I already have attempted at removing gcc and whatnot from Gentoo but |
48 |
> have ended up with a nonbootable system. I would really appreciate if |
49 |
> anyone who has had success in doing this would shed some light and give |
50 |
> some tips. |
51 |
> |
52 |
> Cheers, |
53 |
> |
54 |
> Vano. |
55 |
> |
56 |
> -- |
57 |
> Vano D <gentoo-dev@××××××××××××××××.com> |
58 |
> |
59 |
> |
60 |
> |
61 |
> -- |
62 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
63 |
> |
64 |
> ============================================================ |
65 |
> |
66 |
> |
67 |
> |
68 |
> -- |
69 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
70 |
> |
71 |
> |
72 |
|
73 |
-- |
74 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |