| 1 |
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 20:58, Norberto Bensa wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > portage-2.0.50_pre20 no longer does fetching as root. Make sure that |
| 4 |
> > the /usr/portage directory also has write access by the portage group and |
| 5 |
> > it should work. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Ermm.... This is a RO-NFS shared distfiles and the file was already fetched. |
| 8 |
Get out the paddles, that one is my fault. I've filed a bug for it- |
| 9 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62985 |
| 10 |
and corrected it in cvs. Basically it was a typo in the fetch function, |
| 11 |
that by luck slipped by- instead of |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
if fetched != 2: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Which tests a var that reflects the files status (fully fetched, |
| 16 |
partially, or non-existant), it was |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
if fetch != 2: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Kind of entertaining... it was comparing the fetch function against an |
| 21 |
int :) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> Thanks. I've reverted to 2.0.50-r10 until those hiccups are fixed ;) |
| 24 |
I attached a patch to #62985 that should fix things up for you. If it |
| 25 |
doesn't, please post to the bug. Note this only affects readonly |
| 26 |
distdir's, so general userbase shouldn't hit it. |
| 27 |
~brian |
Archives