Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Tom Van Doorsselaere <tomvd@××××××××××××.be>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: kugelfang@g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 11:07:39
Message-Id: 42887EF5.4040308@wis.kuleuven.be
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc candidates for removal by Danny van Dyk
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Danny van Dyk wrote:
5 |>>Danny: Please put the ebuilds somewhere I can work on them, so that we
6 |>>can get this baby working RSN;)
7 |
8 |
9 | Please have a look at
10 |
11 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~kugelfang/ebuilds/
12 |
13 | where you should find ebuilds for icc, ifc and mkl. The icc one does
14 | not yet fully work on amd64. ifc works fine and mkl too.
15 |
16 | icc needs the most work still.
17
18 Do we have a bug concerning these ebuilds?
19 Should I dump all my comments on this mailing list?
20 Where else can we discuss this topic?
21
22 Tom
23 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
24 Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
25
26 iD8DBQFCiH70QTaBhxBS2xERAqwpAJ9S9qYC6bmmAFNqn6jEOP/KmJE55gCcDRmI
27 Emoc2tKw6rw71r8a3/UoOIk=
28 =lPKp
29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list