Archives
Archives
| From: | Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | ||
| Date: | Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:34:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20100403122902.TAc3125.tv@veller.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass by James Cloos |
||
| 1 | * James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com>: |
| 2 | > One change the perl eclasses require is elimination of the code which |
| 3 | > deletes the man pages. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Deleting the man pages is /extremely/ rude and should not occur. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | There was a reason why the man-pages were removed: I think it was |
| 8 | collisions protection and perl people use `perldoc` anyway. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Do we need a patch to avoid collisions? Do you have it ready and tested? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | Michael Higgins <linux@×××××××.org> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl eclass review - EAPI=3 + new helper eclass | James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> |