| 1 |
Ser Gio wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 00:19:44 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o <mailto:jakub@g.o>> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Ser Gio wrote: |
| 6 |
>> > Hello, |
| 7 |
>> > |
| 8 |
>> > Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the "X" useflag? The ebuild |
| 9 |
>> > doesn't look like it's using it. |
| 10 |
>> > |
| 11 |
>> > thanks, |
| 12 |
>> > Sérgio |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Yes, i noticed that. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
So, why do you ask? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> But, for the enduser, the X flag in gtk+ is useless right? So, is it a bug? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
No, it's not gtk+ ebuild bug. Feel free to submit portage patch to avoid |
| 23 |
this. ;) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Jakub Moc |
| 30 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
| 31 |
GPG signature: |
| 32 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
| 33 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
... still no signature ;) |
Archives