Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 21:37:04
Message-Id: 51214D75.1090201@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo by Agostino Sarubbo
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 02/17/2013 09:30 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
5 > On Sunday 17 February 2013 13:14:28 Alec Warner wrote:
6 >> It is not clear to me why you would email the -dev list about
7 >> these arches, vapier is pretty responsive over email and irc.
8 >
9 > I don't guess is a good idea have a private conversation and then
10 > drop an arch...
11 >
12
13 Drop an arch? Who said that? We are talking about moving arches to
14 ~testing.
15
16 - --
17 Regards,
18 Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
19 http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
20 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
21 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
22
23 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRIU10AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCf0AQAMVJMM1qXWaPkAM2fKSOJ7cJ
24 bVXSHkdwEOLT1ubtHl1mI+WVldsmo6InZKEoWb/NmMz0bc0a3V3ppwpoUqr5afmG
25 Z056nc6geXQE9ipj9FWAhluD9uCY8mlmw7NHzs/AAhWWyMqf9Vt0sS2so/qnVPrM
26 VA/dkVzJHpKvwaIOBSZzL5cci6qMEKG5LjZkbkHdFmZMYrSftcsdVREdOCsWE3Az
27 uYvS2kV5AUeZknZUPRhB63LYnJBU+QrQRUK+tz9UH59K3u8aeaxUjIvKGtD+xdZp
28 h9yy6+4VbA7Ox2MQLi46SVIBD8ulOWyEAnT2v3bEHpyA31O3fYDivyyJ9SlnaFBc
29 74Rgr2mTyVOIZ1a58CTGJzRiZzND97of1dXTKap046ggVobf/ZFILzHKKGmKN1Ui
30 lN1MKA2ODpgozA8jU1STPLY+VKP38fw2mbBIAMcWPftiNq3FUg4/AF6gO7IlX0SO
31 rNH2k/bogb4oEy089vUW7jz+CUYORcGcDKLsZ76RnCx4GWun86fn6LTgwo9TlkNS
32 koKpAYnCyXCMOC0WsiDxO6Xo29HhpAqJV0d4Y40onhm24UGo6HK9WAf24ATip5pG
33 o9WI0kTWXkTdSVNtjzmtVSKh+GHg3Fbemv9p/IF4KO6hc+/6W3xbv/4tFRP3VFsF
34 ThFGF+0qZ/3TIEMgxKy+
35 =A2Sr
36 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>