| 1 |
Hi all, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I'd vote to unmask it, as I and a colleague here at work |
| 4 |
have had it running since September 30ish using the official |
| 5 |
release of 4 without a problem. Without knowing more about |
| 6 |
the RC breakage I can't be sure it won't break for others |
| 7 |
but in daily use I've not had problems (bugs doesn't return |
| 8 |
any submission relating to xfce4-session). |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
my lurking 2cents |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
- Brian |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I unmasked it on amd64, but it was masked on everything before. |
| 17 |
> According to the ChangeLog, apparently it conflicted with the xfce4 |
| 18 |
> beta. Not sure if it should be unmasked or if I should re-mask on amd64, |
| 19 |
> so cc'ing bcowan on this for more info. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Regards, |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Daniel |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives