| 1 |
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 19:15 -0800, David Shakaryan wrote: |
| 2 |
> The desktop-wm herd is understaffed and has a bunch of dead packages |
| 3 |
> lying around which no one wants to maintain. I tried to give a valid |
| 4 |
> alternative for all of the packages I want removed. At first glance, it |
| 5 |
> seems like all of the following packages also have a dead upstream. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> x11-wm/aewm++ -- alternative: pekwm |
| 8 |
> x11-wm/aewm++-goodies -- see above |
| 9 |
> x11-wm/amiwm -- no release since 1998-03-15 |
| 10 |
> x11-wm/larswm -- alternative: pekwm |
| 11 |
> x11-wm/lwm -- alternative: pekwm |
| 12 |
> x11-wm/pwm -- bug #149593, alternative: ion |
| 13 |
> x11-wm/wmi -- superceded by wmii |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Please see bug #153388 for further information along with a list of |
| 16 |
> other bugs requesting removal of desktop-wm packages. Discussion can |
| 17 |
> occur here, but all objections should also be posted on the bug itself. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Flame now or forever hold your peace. ;) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Pwm is a different wm than ion but they are both provided on the same |
| 23 |
tarball so why remove pwm ? Are you trying to add a USE for ion to |
| 24 |
provide pwm ? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives