From: | Alastair Tse <liquidx@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild question | ||
Date: | Fri, 30 May 2003 14:33:07 | ||
Message-Id: | 1054305183.5034.2.camel@huggins.eng.cam.ac.uk | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild question by MAL |
1 | On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 15:22, MAL wrote: |
2 | > Is it better to upload an ebuild as a .tar.bz2 with digests, patches |
3 | > etc. all included? |
4 | |
5 | Ebuilds should not be attached as tar.bz2, they should be in text/plain. |
6 | It's actually written in the Ebuils Contribution Guide somewhere, and |
7 | also one of the most common problems with ebuild submission as I listed |
8 | in my ebuild mistakes list |
9 | (http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/ebuildmistakes.html). |
10 | |
11 | Cheers, |
12 | -- |
13 | Alastair 'liquidx' Tse |
14 | >> Gentoo Developer |
15 | >> http://www.liquidx.net/ | http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/ |
16 | >> GPG Key : http://cvs.gentoo.org/~liquidx/liquidx_gentoo_org.asc |
17 | >> FingerPrint : 579A 9B0E 43E8 0E40 EE93 BB1C 38CE 1C7B 3907 14F6 |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild question | Todd Berman <tberman@g.o> |