From: | Maciej Mrozowski <reavertm@×××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] News item announcing as-needed (glep 42 stuff) | ||
Date: | Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:54:43 | ||
Message-Id: | 201007271753.51383.reavertm@gmail.com | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] News item announcing as-needed (glep 42 stuff) by Jeroen Roovers |
1 | On Tuesday 27 of July 2010 16:39:01 Jeroen Roovers wrote: |
2 | > On Mon, 26 Jul |
3 | 2010 22:29:06 +0200 |
4 | > Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@g.o> wrote: |
5 | > |
6 | > Is it |
7 | time yet? I still find a lot of packages that do not even respect |
8 | > LDFLAGS |
9 | yet - when all these get fixed to respect LDFLAGS, we will |
10 | > probably find |
11 | yet more packages that are problematic with --as-needed. |
12 | |
13 | A few broken apps |
14 | don't overweight the benefit of having --as-needed enabled by default. |
15 | |
16 | -- |
17 | |
18 | regards |
19 | MM |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |