1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
5 |
> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 18:40, Stefan Schweizer wrote: |
6 |
>> 3) split the qt flag into a qt3 and a qt4 flag. This allows users |
7 |
>> to specifically pick qt3 or qt4 and the flag meanings are obvious |
8 |
>> - downsides are it is a lot of work. |
9 |
> I would like migration to this idea, that would have been what I've |
10 |
> liked to see for gtk too. |
11 |
> |
12 |
Gtk did, do this. We had GTK and GTK2 once upon a time. We removed it |
13 |
and basically said that its up to the maintainer to decide which gtk |
14 |
version a application was going to use and the gtk use flag would be |
15 |
used for that. |
16 |
|
17 |
I don't want to go down the path again of having two nearly identical |
18 |
flags for a different slotted version of a framework. I'd like to see |
19 |
just qt with a maintainer deciding if its going to be qt3 or qt4. |
20 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
21 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) |
22 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
23 |
|
24 |
iD8DBQFEmCv9SENan+PfizARArgRAJ45Cyc52Cncg1BXU4/f7+whFZtDXwCcCZrN |
25 |
iszdqTyb2263H8x7fFM6gxI= |
26 |
=Iai+ |
27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |