1 |
Greg KH posted <20060110182106.GA15099@×××××.com>, excerpted below, on |
2 |
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:21:06 -0800: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Well, it's not a Gentoo specific plea, but a Linux kernel plea. I've |
5 |
> created a new kernel tree, git-sources, that tracks the upstream |
6 |
> development kernel tree every day (not the raw git tree, but the nightly |
7 |
> snapshots of it.) |
8 |
> |
9 |
> If you want to help out with kernel development testing, please run |
10 |
> these kernels and let us know if you have problems with them. |
11 |
|
12 |
Whee! This sounds right up my alley! I see the file bugs upstream thing |
13 |
and agree that makes the most sense. |
14 |
|
15 |
I had tried the occasional nightly build, but was never quite sure of the |
16 |
correct procedure to upgrade from one to the next, incremental vs. from |
17 |
-rc patch and all that, so I just tried it a very few times, in |
18 |
particular, when an rc was broken and known to be fixed within the next |
19 |
snapshot or two. This will of course solve that problem for me. |
20 |
=8^) |
21 |
|
22 |
Of course, I've been grabbing directly off of kernel.org. Now I'll have |
23 |
to figure out how to adapt my scripts to use the portage tree |
24 |
git-sources kernels. Fun, fun, fun! =8^) |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
28 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
29 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
30 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |