1 |
Hi. |
2 |
|
3 |
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov <gentoo@×××.name> |
4 |
wrote: |
5 |
> Currently, we have a situation, that there are two Vim's: "old" one |
6 |
(vim8) and |
7 |
> NeoVim... Unfortunately, both of them have different runtimedirs... |
8 |
> |
9 |
> ... NeoVim supports Vim's plugins/scripts very well (although I |
10 |
> didn't find any evidence of the opposite), so it is possible to fix that |
11 |
> situation by many of "kludge" ways, including: |
12 |
> |
13 |
> - patching NeoVim source to include Vim's runtimedirs (incl. "after" dir), |
14 |
> // NeoVim upstream highly disagree with such way, if any |
15 |
|
16 |
But what is the reasoning for upstream from this way? If NeoVim supports |
17 |
vim plugins but not vice versa this looks as a very logical step. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Peter. |