Archives
Archives
| From: | foser <foser@×××××××××××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo ~arch testing policy? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 21 Jan 2004 14:06:58 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1074694011.5478.1.camel@rivendell | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo ~arch testing policy? by Jon Portnoy |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 08:49, Jon Portnoy wrote: |
| 2 | > (if you're testing |
| 3 | > stuff on AMD64 that's marked unstable for an extended period of time |
| 4 | > despite being stable on other architectures, a bug report informing us |
| 5 | > of the fact is very handy) |
| 6 | |
| 7 | *blinks* is amd64 ever marked ~ *blinks* |
| 8 | |
| 9 | ok a bit of a bad joke |
| 10 | |
| 11 | - foser |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |