| 1 |
> The fact you're asking means you really haven't been following anything |
| 2 |
> I've been doing lately. |
| 3 |
Nope ;) I knew that, but as far as I read some of your emails, it was |
| 4 |
thoughts that you protect udev+sysD integration and followed udev's |
| 5 |
functionality downgrade. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> So your whole rant picking up on my post is completely misdirected. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Sorry, if I write it in that manner, that last part looks like adressed |
| 10 |
to you. I tried to write it mostly for GregKH and people, that protect |
| 11 |
SystemD-way distro-development path. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> And let this be a reminder that you can still disagree with the "systemd |
| 14 |
> everywhere, and only" crowd while still not becoming laughing stock. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
And, by the way, I doubt, that people "laugh" about eudev (previously |
| 17 |
named udev-ng) creation. Mostly they just can't understand why gentoo |
| 18 |
devs created third udev's fork, where it was already done (and |
| 19 |
maintained) fork for LFS (somewhere on bitbucket) |
Archives